The logical circle of gamification in medical teaching

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/gr2025268

Keywords:

Gamification, pedagogy, medical education, model

Abstract

Introduction: Medical education faces an unprecedented challenge: transcending traditional memorization methods to develop professionals with critical thinking skills. In this context of urgency and transformation, gamification has been given limited space and no pedagogical framework to support it. Even though, as demonstrated in this paper, this is not a mere trend. On the contrary, if well-founded and supported by an appropriate conceptual model, it can be transformed into a solid teaching strategy with a high impact on meaningful learning. Results: "The logical circle of gamification" postulates the true potential of the game-based teaching strategy. This lies in an iterative and systemic process designed to catalyze meaningful and lasting learning. This model, based on an exhaustive review of the literature, argues that the benefits of gamification do not operate in isolation but are integrated into a virtuous cycle that drives excellence. The Logic Circle is shown to facilitate a vital transition from memory to practice, forcing students to apply their knowledge in dynamic and realistic scenarios actively. Conclusions: Beyond the individual, the Logic Circle enhances teamwork and collaboration, replicating the complex dynamics of a hospital setting and preparing students for the reality of interdisciplinary practice. Each of these elements intertwines and reinforces each others, fueling students' intrinsic motivation and ensuring active and sustained participation.

References

1. Pinilla AE. Modelos pedagógicos y formación de profesionales en el área de la salud. Acta Médica Colombiana 2011;36(4):204–18. https://www.actamedicacolombiana.com/ojs/index.php/actamed/article/view/1451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36104/amc.2011.1451

2. Diaz Contino CG, Gómez García F, Culcay Delgado J, García Coello A. Propuesta de un perfil de competencias profesionales para el docente universitario en el campo de las Ciencias de la Salud. Revista Española de Educación Médica. 2024;5(2). https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.600831 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.600831

3. Urh M, Vukovic G, Jereb E, Pintar R. The Model for Introduction of Gamification into E-learning in Higher Education. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;197:388–97. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042815041555?via%3Dihub DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.154

4. Culcay Delgado JI, Cancino Cedeño EM. Comunicar para enseñar: la influencia de la retórica aristotélica en la docencia en salud. Educación Médica Superior. 2025;39. https://ems.sld.cu/index.php/ems/article/view/4799

5. Culcay Delgado J, Richard E, Ariza-Ayala BE, Salinas Godier C. Authentic Assessment in Medical Microbiology: A Scientific Poster Based Approach. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia. 2024;4. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2024.609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2024.609

6. Maldonado CR, Pungutá Damarys. Análisis de uso y aplicación de estrategias didácticas apoyadas en TIC para la formación por competencias de estudiantes de la UPEL-IPRGR durante la pandemia originada por el COVID-19 Congreso de Tecnología en Educación & Educación en Tecnología: libro de actas. 2021 https://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/122746

7. Diaz Contino CG, Culcay Delgado J, Gómez García F, García Coello A. Diseño curricular en la carrera de Medicina: Experiencias de la Universidad San Gregorio de Portoviejo. Revista San Gregorio. 202430;1(59):124–33. https://revista.sangregorio.edu.ec/index.php/REVISTASANGREGORIO/article/view/2538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v1i59.2538

8. UNESCO. DECLARACIÓN MUNDIAL SOBRE LA EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR EN EL SIGLO XXI: VISIÓN y ACCIÓN. Revista Educación Superior y Sociedad (ESS). 1998;9(2):97–113. https://ess.iesalc.unesco.org/index.php/ess3/article/view/171

9. Greenhalgh T. Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. BMJ. 2001;322(7277):40–4. https://www.bmj.com/content/322/7277/40 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7277.40

10. Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-Based Medical Education: An Ethical Imperative. Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 2006;1(4):252–6. https://journals.lww.com/simulationinhealthcare/fulltext/2006/00140/simulation_based_medical_education__an_ethical.10.aspx DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SIH.0000242724.08501.63

11. Culcay Delgado JI, Soasty Vera R. Entre la Innovación y la Incertidumbre: desafíos y perspectivas de la gamificación para el profesorado de medicina. Revista Española de Educación Médica. 2025;6(4). https://revistas.um.es/edumed/article/view/678001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.678001

12. Graafland M, Schraagen JM, Schijven MP. Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training. British Journal of Surgery. 2012;99(10):1322–30. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8819 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8819

13. Villalustre Martínez L, Moral Pérez ME del. Gamificación: estrategia para optimizar el proceso de aprendizaje y la adquisición de competencias en contextos universitarios. Digital Education Review. 2015;(27):13–31. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5495903&info=resumen&idioma=ENG

14. Marczewski A. Gamification: A Simple Introdution & A Bit More. 2013 153 p. https://books.google.com/books/about/Gamification_A_Simple_Introduction.html?hl=es&id=IOu9kPjlndYC

15. McCoy L, Lewis JH, Dalton D. Gamification and multimedia for medical education: A landscape review. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 2016 1;116(1):22–34. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2016.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2016.003

16. Malone TW. Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction*. Cogn Sci. 1981;5(4):333–69. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0504_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(81)80017-1

17. VYGOTSKY LS. Mind in Society. Cole M, Jolm-Steiner V, Scribner S, Souberman E, editors. Mind in Society. Harvard University Press; 1980. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

18. Krishnamurthy K, Selvaraj N, Gupta P, Cyriac B, Dhurairaj P, Abdullah A, et al. Benefits of gamification in medical education. Clinical Anatomy. 2022;35(6):795–807. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ca.23916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23916

19. van Gaalen AEJ, Brouwer J, Schönrock-Adema J, Bouwkamp-Timmer T, Jaarsma ADC, Georgiadis JR. Gamification of health professions education: a systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2021;26(2):683–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-10000-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-020-10000-3

20. Borjas MP, Navarro-Lechuga E, Puentes-Ospino D, Cruz-García JD la, Yepes-Martínez J, Muñoz-Alvis A, et al. Experiencias ludoevaluativas en el contexto universitario: la evaluación desde una comunidad de aprendizaje. Revista de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación. 2019;10(1):177–90. https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/investigacion_duitama/article/view/10021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19053/20278306.v10.n1.2019.10021

Downloads

Published

2025-10-04

Issue

Section

Short communications

How to Cite

1.
Culcay Delgado JI. The logical circle of gamification in medical teaching. Gamification and Augmented Reality [Internet]. 2025 Oct. 4 [cited 2026 Jan. 9];3:268. Available from: https://gr.ageditor.ar/index.php/gr/article/view/268