The impact of video games on the promotion of active aging: a medical perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/gr2025105Keywords:
Older Adult, Quality of Life, Cognition, Physical Exercise, Healthy Aging, Virtual RealityAbstract
Introduction: currently, population aging is one of the key concerns for healthcare systems and governments, requiring new alternatives to improve quality of life. The rise of technology has made video games and virtual reality widely used in various areas of society, making their use in healthcare unsurprising.
Objective: to analyze the potential of video games as a therapeutic tool to promote well-being and health in old age.
Method: a search was conducted for articles published between 2000 and 2024 through PubMed, Google Scholar, and ChatGPT, focusing on the potential of video games for healthy aging. The following MESH terms were used: "Aging" AND "Cognitive function"; "Exergames" AND "Older adults"; "Video games" AND "Life quality."
Development: video games in active aging programs improve physical fitness, mental health, and quality of life in older adults. Tools like Kinect and iPACES™ promote functional independence, reduce depression, improve memory and executive function, encourage self-management of health, and facilitate communication with healthcare professionals.
Conclusions: the reviewed studies clearly highlight the benefits of using exergames and virtual reality systems in physical and cognitive training programs for older adults. The integration of these innovative technologies not only improves functional fitness and quality of life but also has a significant positive impact on mental health and cognitive function
References
1. Xuelian Fu, Yinli Su, Chunyan Zeng, Liqiong Liu, Yang Guo, Yuanyuan Wu. The mediation and interaction of depressive symptoms in activities of daily living and active aging in rural elderly: A cross-sectional survey. Frontiers in Public Health. 2022; 10:942311. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9517948/
2. Dogra S, Dunstan DW, Sugiyama T, Stathi A, Gardiner PA, Owen N. Active Aging and Public Health: Evidence, Implications, and Opportunities. Annual review of public health. 2022; 43:439–459. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052620-091107
3. Chi YC, Wu CL, Liu HT. Effect of a multi-disciplinary active aging intervention among community elders. Medicine. 2021; 100(51):e28314. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028314
4. Boavida J, Ayanoglu H, Pereira CV, Hernandez-Ramirez R. Active Aging and Smart Public Parks. Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland). 2023; 8(5):94. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics8050094
5. Vázquez FL, Torres ÁJ, Otero P, Blanco V, López L, García-Casal A, Arrojo M. Cognitive-behavioral intervention via interactive multimedia online video game for active aging: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019; 20(1):692. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3859-5
6. Yen HY, Chiu HL. Virtual Reality Exergames for Improving Older Adults' Cognition and Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2021; 22(5):995–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2021.03.009
7. Goldstein J, Cajko L, Oosterbroek M, Michielsen M, Van Houten O, Salverda. Video games and the elderly. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal. 1997; 25(4):345-352(8)
https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/sbp/sbp/1997/00000025/00000004/art00006#expand/collapse
8. Dziechciaż M, Filip R. Biological psychological and social determinants of old age: bio-psycho-social aspects of human aging. Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : AAEM, 2014; 21(4):835–838. https://doi.org/10.5604/12321966.1129943
9. Lin YH, Chen YC, Tseng YC, Tsai ST, Tseng YH. Physical activity and successful aging among middle-aged and older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Aging. 2020; 12(9):7704–7716. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.103057
10. Ying-Chen C; Chen-Long W, Hsiang-Te L. Effect of a multi-disciplinary active aging intervention among community elders. Medicine. 2021; 100(51):e28314. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028314
11. McLaughlin PM, Curtis AF, Branscombe-Caird LM, Comrie JK, Murtha SJE. The Feasibility and Potential Impact of Brain Training Games on Cognitive and Emotional Functioning in Middle-Aged Adults. Games for health journal. 2018; 7(1):67–74. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2017.0032
12. Chen CK, Tsai TH, Lin YC, Lin CC, Hsu SC, Chung CY, Pei YC, Wong AMK. Acceptance of different design exergames in elders. PloS one. 2018; 13(7):e0200185. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200185
13. Yang Y, Wang K, Liu S, Liu H, Zhang T, Luo J. Exergames improve cognitive function in older adults and their possible mechanisms: A systematic review. Journal of global health, 2023; 13:04177. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.13.04177
14. Chaudhry BM, Dasgupta D, Chawla NV. Successful Aging for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: An Experimental Study with a Tablet App. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2022; 19(20):13148. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013148
15. Rica RL, Shimojo GL, Gomes MC, Alonso AC, Pitta RM, Santa-Rosa FA, et al. Effects of a Kinect-based physical training program on body composition, functional fitness and depression in institutionalized older adults. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2020; 20(3):195–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13857
16. Anderson-Hanley C, Stark J, Wall KM, VanBrakle M, Michel M, Maloney M, et al. The interactive Physical and Cognitive Exercise System (iPACES™): effects of a 3-month in-home pilot clinical trial for mild cognitive impairment and caregivers. Clinical interventions in aging. 2018; 13:1565–1577. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S160756
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
