doi: 10.56294/gr20238
REVIEW
Augmented
reality for surgical skills training, update on the topic
Realidad aumentada para
la formación de habilidades quirúrgicas, actualización del tema
Carlos Jesús Canova
Barrios1,2
*, Mariana Pilar
Hereñú1
,
Sabrina Macarena Francisco1
1Universidad
de Ciencias Empresariales y Sociales (UCES). Buenos Aires, Argentina.
2Grupo
de Investigación en Educación en Enfermería. AEUERA.
Cite as:
Canova Barrios CJ, Hereñú MP, Francisco SM. Augmented
reality for surgical skills training, update on the topic. Gamification
and Augmented Reality. 2023; 1:8. https://doi.org/10.56294/gr20238
Submitted:
19-07-2023 Revised: 23-09-2023 Accepted:
29-11-2023 Published: 30-11-2023
Editor:
Adrián Alejandro Vitón-Castillo
ABSTRACT
Augmented reality (AR) combines
digital information with physical reality, allowing users to interact with
virtual data in their real environment. In medical education, this technology
is attractive because it allows access to information without taking your eyes
off the surgical field. The integration of surgical simulators in resident
training offers flexible practice without direct supervision, with benefits
such as objective performance evaluation, practice of unusual procedures, and
the development of non-technical skills. In addition, simulators are useful for
teaching new techniques to experts. In summary, AR and simulators offer
valuable opportunities to improve surgical training. The objective of this
review is to update the current state of augmented reality in surgical
training. The use of augmented reality as an assessment tool in surgical
training presents interesting perspectives that deserve consideration. AR can
provide objective performance metrics by measuring the technical competency of
surgical trainees, whether in a simulated operating environment or in
real-world situations. This offers the opportunity to address subjective
variability and potential bias in current assessment methods, which often rely
on supervisor observation and rating. However, despite these advantages, there
has not yet been a comprehensive review to evaluate the use of AR in surgical
training. The cost-benefit and implications for data management have not yet
been addressed.
Keywords: Augmented
Reality; Training; Surgery; Surgical Techniques.
RESUMEN
La realidad aumentada
(RA) combina información digital con la realidad física, permitiendo a los
usuarios interactuar con datos virtuales en su entorno real. En la educación
médica, esta tecnología es atractiva porque permite acceder a información sin
apartar la vista del campo quirúrgico. La integración de simuladores
quirúrgicos en la formación de residentes ofrece práctica flexible y sin
supervisión directa, con beneficios como la evaluación objetiva del desempeño,
la práctica de procedimientos inusuales y el desarrollo de competencias no
técnicas. Además, los simuladores son útiles para enseñar nuevas técnicas a
expertos. En resumen, la RA y los simuladores ofrecen oportunidades valiosas
para mejorar la formación quirúrgica. El objetivo de esta revisión es actualizar
el estado actual de la realidad aumentada en el entrenamiento quirúrgico. El
uso de la realidad aumentada como herramienta de evaluación en la formación
quirúrgica presenta interesantes perspectivas que merecen consideración. La RA
puede proporcionar métricas objetivas de rendimiento al medir la competencia
técnica de los aprendices quirúrgicos, ya sea en un entorno operativo simulado
o en situaciones reales. Esto ofrece la oportunidad de abordar la variabilidad
subjetiva y el posible sesgo en los métodos actuales de evaluación, que a
menudo dependen de la observación y calificación de los supervisores. Sin
embargo, a pesar de estas ventajas, aún no se ha realizado un examen exhaustivo
paraevaluar el uso de la RA en la formación quirúrgica. Aún no se han abordado
son el costo-beneficio y las implicaciones para la gestión de datos.
Palabras clave:
Realidad Aumentada; Entrenamiento; Cirugía; Técnicas Quirúrgicas.
INTRODUCTION
Surgeons
traditionally learn surgical skills through the "see one, do one, teach
one" method by William Halsted.(1,2) With this, surgeons
receive extensive training under the supervision of an experienced surgeon to
become familiar with these skills.(3)
However,
Halsted's model, the gold standard for surgical science resident training, must
be updated for several reasons, including the impact on patient comfort,
procedure length, operative time and cost, and the potential for
complications.1 Lack of resident training time, limited educational resources
at each surgical center, and increased patient safety and quality demands are
also limiting for this approach.(3)
By its nature,
surgery is a highly visual and tactile specialty that requires a firm
understanding of the three-dimensional arrangement of anatomic structures and
their relationships to one another. While cadaveric models and expert guidance
remain the gold standard of formal surgical education, many centers are
investigating novel digital approaches to augment traditional teaching
practices and inspire the next generation of surgeons.(4)
The dynamic
nature of many surgical procedures demands careful judgment, professional
knowledge, and high levels of care.(1) Simulation-based surgical
skills training is an educational approach that can allow learners to
experience a given task or situation in a safe environment. It provides
standardized, reproducible content for practicing skills, allowing trainees to
practice skills acquired repeatedly; its importance in resident education is
increasingly recognized, and previous studies have demonstrated its
effectiveness.(3)
Augmented
reality (AR) is a technology that expands the physical world by overlaying
digital information such as text, computer-generated images, and 3D graphics
onto the user's real-world view, providing a composite view.(1,2,5,6)
The blending of digital information with real-world stimuli to create a mixed
reality environment that allows the user to interact with virtual information
in the context of their real-world environment.(4)
This technology
allows users to interact with information in the real world, and medical
education, it is attracting attention because users do not have to pause or
look away from the surgical field when accessing information while practicing.(3,7)
Incorporating
surgical simulators into resident curricula provides greater flexibility and
practice without the supervision of an experienced surgeon. Additional benefits
include the opportunity to fail at any time without consequences, objective
performance evaluation, the creation of unusual surgical procedures, and
repeated practice. In addition, simulators are also helpful in teaching new
techniques to experts. Finally, simulators can also help develop non-technical
skills, including teamwork and communication.(1,7)
The objective
of this review is to update the current status of augmented reality in
surgical training.
METHODOLOGY
A search for
information was carried out in January 2024 in the databases Redalyc, Elsevier
Science Direct, PubMed/Medline, and SciELO, as well as the ClinicalKeys
services and the Google Scholar search engine. Advanced search strategies were
used to retrieve the information by structuring search formulas using the terms
"augmented reality," "training," "surgery," and
"surgical techniques," as well as their equivalents in English. From
the resulting documents, we selected those that provided theoretical and
empirical information on cultural competence in health education in Spanish or
English.
DEVELOPMENT
Augmented
reality has been widely used for several years to guide surgical procedures and
build platforms for skills training.(6) This technology has been
growing steadily for years, backed by significant investments from technology
companies with expected but unproven advantages, including cost savings,
reduced complication rate, comprehensive knowledge acquisition, and improved surgical
performance.(4,8)
As
with introducing any new technique in surgery, patient safety must be a
priority. Regarding the rate of postoperative complications, AR has not been
associated with severe complications. The rate of minor complications is not reported
to differ from historical data. This is an important concept to consider as it
supports the safe introduction of this new technology.(4,8)
Real-time
visual feedback that provides more information to trainees may influence their
performance and would be more advantageous than post-exercise feedback.
Physiologic demand in muscle effort can be reduced by using augmented visual
feedback in surgical training. However, distraction and stress are two main
negative factors that should be considered, along with all the potential
advantages of real-time feedback.(6,9)
Augmented
reality can also enhance surgeons' field of view and minimize visual
misperception by augmenting preoperative patient data on the patient's anatomic
structures. A system that achieves this robustly and accurately would be an
essential tool for surgeons, leading to safer operations and minimizing
implications and risks.(7)
AR
allows complementary data to be incorporated into the surgeon's real-world
sensory inputs and has been integrated into orthopedic procedures and surgical
training. This commonly includes overlaying valid visual data, such as relevant
images, on the surgeon's field of view, but can also include auditory or
sensory feedback, intraoperative navigation, and telementoring or guidance.(10)
The
primary focus of surgical curricula has been the acquisition of technical
skills. However, surgical training methods have yet to be developed to train
residents to avoid making errors during surgery. It should be essential to
train situational awareness, as errors result from misperceptions and
suboptimal problem-solving strategies. Modern operating rooms are enriched with
an enormous increase in new technologies. This increases the incoming signals
and, thus, the mental workload during the performance of surgery. AR enables
the transfer of digital information into the real world, thus combining two
worlds. In turn, this creates opportunities to filter information from the
environment because additional information is within the surgeons' field of
view.(11)
AR
is well-suited for training programs aimed at situational awareness.
Situational awareness training in high-risk environments, such as the operating
room, is much needed but needs to be improved in medical education curricula.
The benefit of AR could be widespread, from training better surgeons to making
fewer mistakes in the OR, ultimately leading to improved patient safety. AR is
a new technology in educational methodology. It has demonstrated the enormous
potential within the medical field. Undoubtedly, healthcare will be profoundly
affected by the evolution of AR.(11)
AR
offers a significantly better user experience for hands-on clinical skills
training than virtual reality, given AR's ability to provide honest feedback,
enhanced haptics, and lack of reliance on complex digital graphics that are
often unrealistic.(4)
Many
researchers agree that AR can provide real-time graphical guidance to surgeons,
help them link images to the surgical scene, show trajectories or cut margins,
and minimize anatomical ambiguities. All of these functions create substantial
ways to improve the accuracy of the operation to maximize patient safety inside
the operating room.(6)
When
applied to skills training, AR can guide trainees to practice a complex
procedure without frequent pauses in the middle of practice to seek
instruction. The necessary instruction can be shown to trainees in their
lateral view. This AR feature is helpful for healthcare learners when
practicing a procedure composed of multiple steps, such as delivering a baby or
inserting a chest tube.(6)
Theology
could likely be related to medical specialty. For example, trainees in urology,
a branch of surgery that uses endoscopic and robotic techniques for many
procedures, might benefit more from using AR in skill acquisition and
performance than trainees in other specialties. The literature still needs to
be more sparse for meaningful comparisons of AR training in different
specialties.(12)
Simulation-based
training may be one of the practical educational methods not only to promote
patient safety but also to prevent medical errors. Simulation training is
widely used in various fields, such as aviation, military, industry, and
medicine. It has become common in medical education. Several benefits of
medical simulation are commonly accepted:(13)
· minimize ethical issues,
· enhance the educational experience,
· provide learner-centered education and a supportive
environment for teachers,
· provide a risk-free environment for the patient,
· enable users to learn and practice new techniques,
· enable performance evaluation.
Augmented Reality
Simulators (ARS)
Today,
virtual, augmented, and mixed reality (MR) surgical simulators have been
developed. AR benefits preoperative surgical preparation, providing useful
outcome predictions and intraoperative navigation to minimize potential risks.
MRI has enabled three-dimensional (3D) images to be completer and more
accurate, thus improving surgical navigation and preprocessing.(1)
Available
systems that support surgical procedures using augmented visualization use
virtual reality headsets, goggles with translucent displays, or external
computer displays. For example, head-mounted displays such as Google Glass or
Microsoft Hololens are used in medical procedural training research. Although
headsets are often reported to be helpful, they create a physical barrier
between surgeons and their environment, imposing an undesirable situation
during medical procedures. In addition, most translucent devices require
additional external tracking markers to position virtual structures accurately,
especially in changing environments. Most of these devices are uncomfortable to
wear and use for prolonged periods and often cause eyestrain, headaches, and
substantial discomfort. Also, external displays can cause discomfort due to
frequent shifting of the surgeon's focus between the patient and the screen,
thus prolonging operating time.(8)
In
an ARS, a learner can use real surgical instruments with physical materials
while performing a task, e.g., instrument navigation, clipping, and pin
transfer. Meanwhile, virtual environments are overlaid to express surgical
scenes, such as human anatomy.(13)
Microsoft Hololens
HoloLens
is a head-mounted augmented reality display. The smart glasses allow a high
level of user interactivity through natural interface commands with gaze,
gesture, and voice inputs. Training has been used in ureteroscopy,
neurosurgery, cholecystectomy, urogynecologic surgery, and lung adenocarcinoma
procedures. It has been reported to significantly improve economy of motion and
error rates and overall user performance: shorter response time, more positive
emotions, and less cognitive load and effort.(14)
Augmented Reality Telementoring System
The
Telementoring System with Augmented Reality (STRA) projects operational
instructions directly into the user's field of vision. Used in the context of
trauma, cricothyroidotomy, and basic surgical skills. Users have demonstrated
fewer positioning errors, fewer changes in focus, and greater confidence during
the procedure.(14)
Immersive Touch System
The
ImmersiveTouch system uses specialized glasses and a robotic stylus to immerse
the user in an interactive 3D environment with haptic feedback. Several studies
have evaluated this simulation platform in the context of neurosurgery and
trauma. The overall performance of ImmersiveTouch in terms of validity and
translational outcomes is promising.(14)
Augmented Reality Promis Simulator
The
ProMIS simulator retains all the qualities of a traditional box trainer but has
the added benefit of providing objective feedback on performance measures.
ProMIS has been used to assess and train basic laparoscopic skills. Studies
show overall improvement and higher scores.(6)
Google Glass
Google
Glass, also known simply as Glass, is a pair of lightweight smart glasses
extensively tested in medical research. Their use in urology and basic surgical
skills has been described.(14)
Perk Station
The
Perk Station simulator was designed for training in percutaneous surgery.
Studies found that with the AR simulator, there was less tissue damage and a
better success rate than the comparison in both orthopedic and neurosurgical
training contexts.(14)
Art Platform
ART
Platform is a simulator designed to superimpose a mentor's instruments on the
trainee's laparoscopic monitor. Randomized control trials demonstrated faster
skill acquisition, quicker task completion time, fewer errors, and a shorter
and steeper learning curve than traditional methods.(15)
Encouragingly,
the efficacy of AR in surgical skill acquisition through
tutoring/telementoring, which provides real-time tutoring for surgical
procedures by an expert at a remote location,(14) is encouraging.
Applications
Neurosurgery
Advanced
techniques and algorithms in virtual reality, augmented reality, and MRI
provide neurosurgeons with the ability to perform accurate surgical planning,
intraoperative monitoring, and postoperative follow-up. Virtual and augmented
reality simulation has been applied in endoscopic and cranial tumor
neurosurgery. There are clinical applications concerning bone dissection,
cerebral aneurysm clipping, microvascular decompression, and pedicle screw
placement. AR has been helpful in neurooncologic procedures to identify lesions,
direct resection, schedule craniotomy, and skin incision before surgery.
Image-guided AR neuronavigation systems have been developed for vascular
surgery, external ventricular drainage placement, and other applications in
cerebral aneurysms, spine surgery, tumor resection, intracranial meningioma,
and craniosynostosis surgery.(3)
Maxillofacial Surgery
AR
in maxillofacial surgery is beneficial for preoperative planning by providing
practical outcome prognostics and intraoperative navigation to minimize potential
risks. It has also been applied in dental implantology and visualization of
alveolar nerve bundles.(3)
General surgery
It
has been reported that AR is mainly used to recognize lesions. AR navigation
has been used to improve protection from surgical dissection in
pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreaticoduodenal artery examination, hilar
cholangiocarcinoma intervention, and open urologic and liver surgeries.(3)
Laparoscopic and
minimally invasive surgery
Unlike
open surgery, laparoscopic surgery requires a different skill set and is
sometimes more complicated than open surgery. Reduced working hours, fewer
training sessions, and patient safety issues result in acquiring these skills
outside the operating room. Therefore, both virtual reality and augmented
reality modeling have been leveraged. Laparoscopic liver surgery has been one
of the main applications of AR. Virtual and augmented reality has also been
applied in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and gynecologic laparoscopic
surgery.(5)
The
recent use of AR in minimally invasive surgery has led to the development of
hybrid image-guided surgery using endoscopic and robotic video transmissions.
An institution dedicated to image-guided hybrid therapies has been developed.
However, the delivery of AR in open surgery will require alternative technology
for surgeon interface.(5)
The
role of AR as an assessment tool merits consideration since objective
performance metrics can be measured using AR platforms either in the simulated
operating environment or, preferably, in real life to measure technical
competence. Consequently, there is an opportunity to address the inherent
subjective variability and potential bias of current methods of evaluating
surgical trainees, which rely on supervisors observing trainees and rating
competence concerning technical expertise, clinical judgment, professionalism,
and ethical interpersonal skills.(14)
Despite
these exciting perspectives, a comprehensive review to evaluate the use of AR
in surgical training has yet to be conducted. 4 Two critical issues have not
been addressed to date: cost-benefit, which will need to be weighed against the
promise of increased speed of skill acquisition and large-scale implementation
of new data-intensive technologies; implications for data management, including
ownership and confidentiality, as well as infrastructure requirements, must
also be considered.(12)
CONCLUSIONS
Augmented
reality is a technology that combines the physical world with
computer-generated virtual elements, allowing users to visualize additional
information about their environment in real-time. In training surgical
techniques, augmented reality offers a valuable tool to improve the accuracy
and efficiency of procedures. Augmented reality provides detailed visual guidance
during surgery, which can help reduce errors and minimize the risk of
complications. In addition, this technology makes it possible to simulate
complex surgical scenarios and provide real-time feedback, which facilitates
learning and practicing new techniques.
REFERENCES
1.
Lungu AJ, Swinkels W, Claesen L, Tu P, Egger J, Chen X. A review on the
applications of virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality in
surgical simulation: an extension to different kinds of surgery. Expert Review
of Medical Devices 2021;18:47-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2021.1860750.
2.
Ropelato S, Menozzi M, Michel D, Siegrist M. Augmented Reality Microsurgery: A
Tool for Training Micromanipulations in Ophthalmic Surgery Using Augmented
Reality. Sim Healthcare 2020;15:122-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000413.
3.
Nagayo Y, Saito T, Oyama, Hiroshi. A Novel Suture Training System for Open
Surgery Replicating Procedures Performed by Experts Using Augmented Reality. J Med Syst 2021;45:60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-021-01735-6.
4.
Williams MA, McVeigh J, Handa AI, Lee R. Augmented reality in surgical
training: a systematic review. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2020;96:537-42. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137600.
5.
Dickey RM, Srikishen N, Lipshultz LI, Spiess PE, Carrion RE, Hakky TS.
Augmented reality assisted surgery: a urologic training tool. Asian J Androl
2016;18:732. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.166436.
6.
Lu S, Sanchez Perdomo YP, Jiang X, Zheng B. Integrating Eye-Tracking to
Augmented Reality System for Surgical Training. J Med Syst 2020;44:192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01656-w.
7.
Loukas C. Surgical Simulation Training Systems: Box Trainers, Virtual Reality
and Augmented Reality Simulators. IJARA 2016;1:1-9. https://doi.org/10.15226/2473-3032/1/2/00109.
8.
Gierwiało R, Witkowski M, Kosieradzki M, Lisik W, Groszkowski Ł,
Sitnik R. Medical Augmented-Reality Visualizer for Surgical Training and
Education in Medicine. Applied Sciences 2019;9:2732. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9132732.
9.
Zahiri M, Nelson CA, Oleynikov D, Siu K-C. Evaluation of Augmented Reality
Feedback in Surgical Training Environment. Surg Innov 2018; 25:81-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350617739425.
10.
Cao C, Cerfolio RJ. Virtual or Augmented Reality to Enhance Surgical Education
and Surgical Planning. Thoracic Surgery Clinics 2019; 29:329-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2019.03.010.
11.
Barsom EZ, Graafland M, Schijven MP. Systematic review on the effectiveness of
augmented reality applications in medical training. Surg Endosc 2016;
30:4174-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4800-6.
12.
Sheik-Ali S, Edgcombe H, Paton C. Next-generation Virtual and Augmented Reality
in Surgical Education: A Narrative Review s. f.;33.
13.
Hong M, Rozenblit JW, Hamilton AJ. Simulation-based surgical training systems
in laparoscopic surgery: a current review. Virtual Reality 2021; 25:491-510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00469-z.
14.
Kovoor JG, Gupta AK, Gladman MA. Validity and effectiveness of augmented
reality in surgical education: A systematic review. Surgery 2021; 170:88-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.01.051.
15.
Suresh D, Aydin A, James S, Ahmed K, Dasgupta P. The Role of Augmented Reality
in Surgical Training: A Systematic Review. Surg Innov 2023; 30:366-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506221140506.
FINANCING
The
authors received no funding for the development of this research.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The
authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
AUTHORSHIP CONTRIBUTION
Conceptualization: Carlos Jesús Canova Barrios, Mariana Pilar Hereñú, Sabrina
Macarena Francisco.
Data
curation: Jesús Canova
Barrios, Mariana Pilar Hereñú, Sabrina Macarena Francisco.
Formal
analysis: Jesús Canova
Barrios, Mariana Pilar Hereñú, Sabrina Macarena Francisco.
Acquisition
of funds: Jesús Canova
Barrios, Mariana Pilar Hereñú, Sabrina Macarena Francisco.
Research: Jesús Canova Barrios, Mariana Pilar Hereñú, Sabrina
Macarena Francisco.
Methodology: Jesús Canova Barrios, Mariana Pilar Hereñú, Sabrina
Macarena Francisco.
Project
administration:
Jesús Canova Barrios, Mariana Pilar Hereñú, Sabrina Macarena Francisco.
Resources: Jesús Canova Barrios, Mariana Pilar Hereñú, Sabrina
Macarena Francisco.
Software: Jesús Canova Barrios, Mariana Pilar Hereñú, Sabrina
Macarena Francisco.
Supervision:
Jesús Canova Barrios, Mariana Pilar Hereñú, Sabrina Macarena Francisco.
Validation: Jesús Canova Barrios, Mariana Pilar Hereñú, Sabrina
Macarena Francisco.
Visualization: Jesús Canova Barrios, Mariana Pilar Hereñú, Sabrina
Macarena Francisco.
Writing
- original draft:
Jesús Canova Barrios, Mariana Pilar Hereñú, Sabrina Macarena Francisco.
Writing
- revision and editing:
Jesús Canova Barrios, Mariana Pilar Hereñú, Sabrina Macarena Francisco.